Three weeks into the course, and already I found myself
reevaluating the way I read and write. Over the past couple weeks, we’ve been
learning to develop better and more well developed thesis statements. Writing
has always been my strong suit, but as I think back, my thesis statements
seemingly came across as broad and basic. Hopefully, this course will help me
to develop such well-developed thesis that my papers will seemingly just flow
better; I’d like to build a thesis that presents such a strong argument that my
paper will be able to hold 4-6 paragraphs worth of supporting details.
Aside
from the thesis statement, we have been discussing the differences between
autobiographies and biographies. The pieces we’ve read so far, in which are of
autobiographical nature, are the pieces that have seemingly caught my full and
undivided attention. What’s better than writing about you? Who knows you better
than you? Nobody. You can take such a creative spin on your take and your
writing, all while telling your factual life story and that’s what I love most
about it. I like that fact that in an autobiography you’re recalling on
accounts in your life, but taking your own creative knowledge and placing different
tones and styles behind the content and context of your autobiography.
Summarizing
and responding… Now I know that these are two completely different things. With
more practice I plan on being able to respond to a writer’s piece with little
to no effort. I plan on finding specific things in a writer’s work and being
able to respond to it individually. I think this will come with better critical
reading skills and a better sense of reading for analysis instead of reading
for information.